3 responses to “Monday Moxie: Privacy Protected”

  1. Nettie Weber

    Bravo!

    When I owned my agency this is one of the things we would screen candidates for prior to accepting them- we’d take a good look at their social networking profiles ( we used to friend candidates specifically for this reason and most would friend back). There were several nanny candidates that were disqualified due to their serious lack of privacy errors that we found: tons and tons of photos of their charges with full names, details about playdates they were going on, ranting and raving about their jobs, telling too many details about the parents personal lives… and the list went on. We’d look for this type of behavior on nanny message boards, as well (what you didn’t know that being an agency owner involves a little detective work? ;) ). I will never forget the candidate who argued with me and threatened to sue the agency over not hiring her due to these things citing that “only her fb friends could see those things- so she WAS being private!” Right. Her employers would have been thrilled to learn that she shared with her closest 553 friends that her dadboss just lost his job and was a real pain in the neck to have around the house during her shift- they would have also loved to have seen the 100 photos that she had posted of their children, first and last names… :-O

    Great article Greta!! :-)

  2. Tweets that mention : Monday Moxie Privacy Protected -- Topsy.com

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Alice Shaffer and Patti M, Regarding Nannies. Regarding Nannies said: http://bit.ly/aY0TfU Monday Moxie Privacy Protected [...]

  3. : Weekend Round Up Week of August 2-6 2010

    [...] Monday Moxie: Privacy Protected [...]

Leave a Reply

Featuring Recent Posts Wordpress Widget development by YD